Menu

STARS ***

SUPPORT OF THE AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE IN REGION 3
(STARS ***) – DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES

INTRODUCTION

This doc­u­ment describes the work to pro­mote and devel­op ama­teur radio in IARU Region 3.

The “Task Force” for this work is called the “Sup­port of the Ama­teur Radio Ser­vice” (STARS) in Region 3.  Their short ref­er­ence title is “STARS ***” Task Force (some­times writ­ten as STARS 3).

Details are giv­en of the:

  • His­to­ry
  • Broad Goals and Objec­tives for STARS ***
  • Rec­om­mend­ed Meth­ods of Working
  • Back­ground
  • Range of “Devel­op­ment” categories

It is clear that pro­gress­ing the devel­op­ment of ama­teur radio in Region 3 is vital, and that this task is not easy to achieve.  There are many chal­lenges and opportunities.

Annex – Detailed Information on Promotion and Development

More details and infor­ma­tion are pro­vid­ed in the Annex about:

Range of challenges

Phys­i­cal and geo­graph­ic constraints

  • Devel­op­ing coun­try” definitions
  • Orga­ni­za­tion­al restraints
  • Social restraints
  • Human resources
  • Train­ing
  • Resources and materials
  • Infra­struc­ture limitations
  • Fund­ing
  • Equip­ment
  • Anten­nas
  • Rep­re­sen­ta­tion of Ama­teur Radio
  • Meth­ods and procedures

HISTORY

The devel­op­ment activ­i­ties in each IARU Region were orig­i­nal­ly named the “Pro­mo­tion of Ama­teur Radio in Devel­op­ing Coun­tries” (PADC) pri­or to 1993.  How­ev­er, “devel­op­ing” was hard to clear­ly define and in many cas­es not a real­is­tic name.  In some sit­u­a­tions it was counter-pro­duc­tive.  The IARU Region 1 Con­fer­ence in Bel­gium in Sep­tem­ber 1993 reviewed their expe­ri­ence.  They pro­posed that their Work­ing Group be renamed as the “Sup­port of the Ama­teur Radio Ser­vice” (STARS) in Region 1.  Their short ref­er­ence title was “STARS *”.

Ear­ly lead­er­ship in Region 3 was pro­vid­ed by JARL with a plan for the “Pro­mo­tion of Ama­teur Radio”.  They pro­vid­ed a Con­ven­er, fund­ing, organ­i­sa­tion and kit sets etc.  JARL is still strong­ly com­mit­ted to this activ­i­ty in 2013.

IARU Region 3 fol­lowed the Region 1 lead at our 9th Region­al Con­fer­ence in Sin­ga­pore in Sep­tem­ber 1994.  Based on a pro­pos­al from NZART, PADC was changed to “STARS ***”.

BROAD GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR STARS ***

The broad goals of STARS *** are to pro­mote ama­teur radio and help it grow in IARU Region 3.  This includes help­ing to estab­lish and grow a Nation­al Soci­ety to pro­vide local rep­re­sen­ta­tion for their radio ama­teurs.  This has to be long term and sustainable.

In the ini­tial stages of devel­op­ment, a pos­i­tive effect can be achieved by:

  • Pro­vid­ing assis­tance to form and grow an IARU mem­ber society
  • Help­ing to estab­lish and devel­op­ing key Radio Clubs and sta­tions, often in col­lab­o­ra­tion with an estab­lished local group or institution
  • Help­ing devel­op a close rela­tion­ship with the Min­istry or radio regulator
  • Enabling the train­ing of key admin­is­tra­tors and reg­u­la­tors (with atten­dance at IARU “Ama­teur Radio Admin­is­tra­tion Cours­es” (ARAC))
  • Help­ing estab­lish ini­tial train­ing cours­es and exam­i­na­tion sys­tems that sat­is­fy the licens­ing author­i­ty, and qual­i­fy a core group of local peo­ple as radio amateurs

The basic objec­tives defined for indi­vid­ual projects imple­ment­ed by the STARS *** Task Force are that they need to be:

  • Sim­ple in concept
  • Tar­get­ed to meet the needs
  • Lim­it­ed in scope at each stage
  • Sus­tain­able, by both IARU Region 3 and the recipients
  • Local­ly based
  • Involve the local IARU Region 3 Society
  • Based on radio clubs or groups, more than rely­ing on individuals
  • Capa­ble of being funded

RECOMMENDED METHODS OF WORKING

Some basic meth­ods and process­es are rec­om­mend­ed to guide the way that the STARS *** Task Force pro­gress­es projects and car­ries out its work.  Meth­ods are need­ed to allow order­ly and sys­tem­at­ic progress.

The meth­ods and process­es are as follows:

  1. Review and con­firm the Con­venor of the STARS *** Task Force, Sec­re­tari­at func­tion and mem­bers of the group at each three year­ly Region­al Conference
  2. Active­ly seek and con­tin­u­ous­ly col­lect infor­ma­tion on pro­mo­tion and “devel­op­ment” needs from Mem­ber Soci­eties, the Direc­tors and oth­er peo­ple in Region 3.  All reports and enquiries received should be acknowledged.
  3. Col­lect infor­ma­tion on the capa­bil­i­ties, exper­tise and assis­tance that is available
  4. Main­tain a data­base record of the needs and help pro­vid­ed, and dis­trib­ute it to the Task Force group members
  5. Deter­mine the “Devel­op­ment Cat­e­go­ry” A, B, C for each case of need (see later)
  6. Iden­ti­fy candidates/projects for assis­tance and the type of help and actions required
  7. Get agree­ment with­in the STARS *** Task Force on pri­or­i­ties and action needed
  8. Allow for long project time cycles and design for sus­tain­abil­i­ty after the project ends
  9. Request the assis­tance need­ed from oth­er Soci­eties and seek a “fos­ter” soci­ety to help
  10. Action each project in turn and track its project life cycle
  11. Report on progress to the Work­ing Group mem­bers and the Direc­tors at reg­u­lar inter­vals (3 or 6 monthly)
  12. Pro­vide a Sum­ma­ry Report on progress to each Tri­en­ni­al Region 3 Conference
  13. Col­lect and analyse feed­back (suc­cess and fail­ure) from projects to guide improvements
  1. Pub­li­cise the suc­cess­es and ben­e­fits achieved, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the Region 3 Newsletter

It was sug­gest­ed that a sim­ple data­base record sys­tem be set up, and a basic project sheet tem­plate and flow chart be used to guide each project.

BACKGROUND

Ear­li­er work iden­ti­fied the main con­straints to devel­op­ment in Region 3.  The key chal­lenges for many Soci­eties are a lack of:

  • Train­ing cours­es, mate­ri­als, instructors
  • Local Exam­i­na­tion sys­tems that are acces­si­ble to those want­i­ng to become radio amateurs
  • Licens­ing sys­tems (pro­vid­ed by the Reg­u­la­tor in a time­ly way)
  • Radio equip­ment, sources of pow­er, and antennas
  • Help for peo­ple to gain oper­at­ing skills and expe­ri­ence to get on the air
  • Sup­port from local author­i­ties and a pos­i­tive gov­ern­ment environment
  • Finance

RANGE OFDEVELOPMENTCATEGORIES

Three pos­si­ble gen­er­al stages of “devel­op­ment” have been pre­vi­ous­ly iden­ti­fied and some broad strate­gies pro­posed for each one.

In sum­ma­ry they were:

  • Cat­e­go­ry A — Coun­tries where ama­teur radio is not per­mit­ted or where no licensed ama­teurs exist.  The ben­e­fits of ama­teur radio need to be demon­strat­ed to gov­ern­ment and the author­i­ties, per­mis­sion to oper­ate gained, and inter­est­ed local peo­ple found.  A Mem­ber Soci­ety has to be estab­lished.  Con­tin­u­ous fol­low up is essential.
  • Cat­e­go­ry B — Coun­tries where oper­a­tion is per­mit­ted but activ­i­ty is low.  A local ama­teur radio soci­ety may or may not exist.  A soci­ety may need to be estab­lished and mem­ber­ship pro­mot­ed.  They usu­al­ly need train­ing assis­tance and equip­ment, help from a devel­oped neigh­bour soci­ety, and assis­tance to pro­mote ama­teur radio.
  • Cat­e­go­ry C — Coun­tries with devel­oped soci­eties but a lack of resources, espe­cial­ly for train­ing, exam­i­na­tions and licens­ing (there may be gov­ern­ment restric­tions).  Assis­tance is required with train­ing mate­ri­als, guide­lines, and help from a fos­ter soci­ety.  Help will prob­a­bly be need­ed to encour­age young entrants (e.g. with novice licences or similar).

Each sit­u­a­tion needs to be exam­ined indi­vid­u­al­ly and a spe­cif­ic solu­tion found.

ANNEXDETAILED INFORMATION ON PROMOTION AND DEVELOPMENT

This Annex con­tains detailed infor­ma­tion about var­i­ous aspects and issues that affect and influ­ence pro­mo­tion and “devel­op­ment” of Ama­teur radio in IARU Region 3.

There are many chal­lenges and oppor­tu­ni­ties.  It is clear that many tasks are not easy to achieve.

Range of Challenges

Three pos­si­ble gen­er­al stages of “devel­op­ment” were iden­ti­fied above and giv­en a Cat­e­go­ry A, B or C descrip­tion.  Some broad strate­gies were pro­posed for each one.

A very wide range of chal­lenges can be iden­ti­fied.  A “blan­ket” approach is not pos­si­ble.  Each sit­u­a­tion needs to be exam­ined indi­vid­u­al­ly; on a coun­try by coun­try basis.  Account needs to be tak­en of gov­ern­ment atti­tudes, local laws, cul­ture, past events and any his­to­ry of ama­teur radio etc.  Spe­cif­ic solu­tions are need­ed in each case.  Many fac­tors affect the “devel­op­ment” of ama­teur radio.

Developing Country” Definitions

While “devel­op­ing coun­try” is now not used in the title of the activ­i­ties of STARS ***, some back­ground infor­ma­tion is help­ful.  In some sit­u­a­tions “devel­op­ing coun­try” has been found to a counter-pro­duc­tive name.  How­ev­er, in oth­er sit­u­a­tions a def­i­n­i­tion is need­ed to focus atten­tion and help define needs and solutions.

The var­i­ous cri­te­ria gen­er­al­ly used to define “devel­op­ing” are based Gross Domes­tic Prod­uct (GDP), dis­pos­able incomes or some oth­er rec­og­nized eco­nom­ic indi­ca­tor.  UNESCO pro­duces such lists.  For ama­teur radio to be sus­tained, as a min­i­mum it would be expect­ed that there is a small, per­ma­nent pop­u­la­tion, with some eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment and infra­struc­ture.  Aver­age annu­al incomes would typ­i­cal­ly be in the range US$500 — $5,000.  At the low­est end of the range would be small island groups and nations.  They may have only a sub­sis­tence pop­u­la­tion, and lit­tle rea­son­able hope for ama­teur radio activ­i­ty oth­er than by vis­i­tors or expatriates.

Organizational Restraints

In many coun­tries there are no bar­ri­ers to ama­teur radio.  Gov­ern­ment radio reg­u­la­tions include the autho­riza­tion, exam­i­na­tion and the issue of ama­teur licences and call signs.  At offi­cial lev­els the val­ue of ama­teur radio to the nation is under­stood and encouraged.

In oth­er coun­tries there may be only lim­it­ed inter­est at offi­cial lev­els in the aims and objects of ama­teur radio.  Licens­ing sys­tems may exist for the local peo­ple, but can be dif­fi­cult to access.  Local call signs may be issued.  Licens­es and call signs may also be issued to vis­i­tors or expa­tri­ates based on an operator’s cer­tifi­cate issued elsewhere.

In a very few coun­tries ama­teur radio is still for­bid­den.  Spe­cial mea­sures are need­ed before ama­teur radio can start to develop.

The biggest prob­lem in some coun­tries is usu­al­ly the total lack of any exam­i­na­tion process and oth­er sys­tems to allow them to become qual­i­fied and get a local licence.  This is an area where oth­er coun­tries and their mem­ber soci­eties, IARU Region 3 (via STARS ***) and the IARU can help.

Pri­or to pass­ing any exam­i­na­tion, there is a need for train­ing in the tech­ni­cal, oper­a­tional and reg­u­la­to­ry aspects of ama­teur radio.  Basic edu­ca­tion with­in the coun­try, espe­cial­ly trade train­ing in elec­tron­ics, may not be read­i­ly avail­able.  Ade­quate train­ing cours­es take sig­nif­i­cant time and resources.  Help is needed.

Edu­ca­tion” of a wide group of peo­ple is also often need­ed – includ­ing gov­ern­ment offi­cials, the licens­ing author­i­ty, telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions net­work oper­a­tors, edu­ca­tion providers etc.  The IARU has done much valu­able work in this area.  They can pro­vide an “Ama­teur Radio Admin­is­tra­tion Course” (ARAC) specif­i­cal­ly tar­get­ed at train­ing and edu­cat­ing Min­istry offi­cials and reg­u­la­tors.  A crit­i­cal require­ment is to iden­ti­fy a “friend­ly” admin­is­tra­tion to host such cours­es.  ARAC cours­es have been run in all Regions for more than 30 years.  They have had a sig­nif­i­cant impact.  IARU Region 3 coor­di­nates requests for ARAC’s in our Region.

Many coun­tries have devel­oped from ear­li­er colonies, trust ter­ri­to­ries and pro­tec­torates of Britain, the US and Euro­pean coun­tries.  There may be tra­di­tion­al links and con­tin­u­ing aid com­ing from these coun­tries.  These his­tor­i­cal links are log­i­cal chan­nels for seek­ing help for the devel­op­ment of ama­teur radio.  These links need to be devel­oped and the con­cept of a “fos­ter soci­ety” pur­sued where pos­si­ble.  How­ev­er, the pro­vi­sion of assis­tance from a remote donor coun­try (per­haps with­out much pre­vi­ous expe­ri­ence), even if well inten­tioned, can be dif­fi­cult and frus­trat­ing.  Some recip­i­ent coun­tries may be sen­si­tive to some donor or aid coun­tries, due to ear­li­er his­to­ry or polit­i­cal events.  This needs to be rec­og­nized in advance.

Social Restraints

An obvi­ous prob­lem is the lack of mon­ey avail­able to indi­vid­u­als, espe­cial­ly dis­pos­able cash income.  There may be few jobs and lev­els of employ­ment as low as 10%.  The con­cept of an “extend­ed fam­i­ly” is often wide­ly prac­ticed.  The fam­i­ly unit can embrace a whole vil­lage and include oth­ers liv­ing in cap­i­tal cities or even over­seas.  Many young fam­i­ly mem­bers in employ­ment send remit­tance pay­ments back to their fam­i­ly to sup­port them.  Extend­ed fam­i­lies can also be tak­en fur­ther to include prop­er­ty and land being “com­mu­ni­ty owned”.  There is lit­tle pri­vate and per­son­al own­er­ship of goods and assets.  Few peo­ple also have per­son­al or pri­vate space in their hous­es that is secure to allow own­er­ship of radio equipment.

In these sit­u­a­tions, own­er­ship of per­son­al trans­ceivers is very dif­fi­cult for many peo­ple.  “Club sta­tions” can be a more real­is­tic first step that match­es the social struc­ture.  The risk is that no one per­son may be respon­si­ble for any of the equip­ment.  Main­te­nance and secu­ri­ty are challenges.

Human Resources

Pop­u­la­tions may be small and scat­tered.  There may also be lan­guage bar­ri­ers with local dialects.  Eng­lish (or anoth­er Euro­pean lan­guage) although taught, is often not the first or only lan­guage used.  The peo­ple are often shy and dif­fer­ences in cul­ture cause them to be reserved with for­eign­ers.  Devel­op­ments will take time and trust needs to be devel­oped.  A flex­i­ble approach is need­ed.  A lack of edu­ca­tion and train­ing in tech­ni­cal sub­jects is a challenge.

The time need­ed to com­plete a project is often under-esti­mat­ed.  Most suc­cess­ful “aid” projects have been the result of indi­vid­ual and group effort, with clear objec­tives.  Inno­va­tion will be need­ed.  Some suc­cess­ful projects will be a mix of local and expa­tri­ate effort, some­times start­ed by acci­dent.  Depen­dence on only a few indi­vid­u­als can be high risk.

Some pre­lim­i­nary “sell­ing” of the ben­e­fits of ama­teur radio and a project may be necessary.

Training

A lack of “tech­ni­cal” and oth­er types of train­ing is already rec­og­nized as a con­straint to the growth of ama­teur radio (and devel­op­ing an “advanced” econ­o­my).  The needs for train­ing have to be specif­i­cal­ly iden­ti­fied for any project to succeed.

Train­ing is clear­ly need­ed pri­or to pass­ing an exam­i­na­tion – often just suf­fi­cient to pass.  More help is need­ed after­wards to get on the air, gain con­fi­dence and expe­ri­ence.  As well as basic train­ing mate­ri­als and aids, instruc­tors and facil­i­ties are also need­ed.  An orga­ni­za­tion is need­ed to man­age the process­es and trainees.  Any exist­ing trade train­ing or edu­ca­tion­al estab­lish­ment can pro­vide the basis for ama­teur radio train­ing and should not be overlooked.

Resources and Materials

Train­ing resources and mate­ri­als are nec­es­sary.  They have to cov­er the range of cours­es pro­posed, doc­u­men­ta­tion, hand­books, train­ing books, mag­a­zines and oth­er obvi­ous “library” items.  Typ­i­cal exam­i­na­tion “Ques­tions and Answers” guides and basic radio train­ing man­u­als are need­ed.  More advanced items may include cor­re­spon­dence cours­es, audio and video tapes and disks, demon­stra­tion mate­ri­als and kit sets etc.  The range of mate­ri­als has to cov­er from the licence exam­i­na­tion, through to get­ting an oper­a­tional sta­tion working.

Human resources – instruc­tors and train­ers are need­ed.  Phys­i­cal space at a club rooms or train­ing facil­i­ty are also nec­es­sary.  A work­ing ama­teur radio sta­tion with a trans­ceiv­er and anten­na is a good moti­va­tion, and valu­able for demonstrations.

DXpe­di­tions are some­times seen as a resource.  While they have high lev­els of pub­lic­i­ty at the time, they often result in few long term ben­e­fits to the local Soci­ety or ama­teurs.  Any “devel­op­ment” goals or activ­i­ties need to be “designed into” the DXpe­di­tion from the outset.

Physical and Geographic Constraints

In the Asia – Pacif­ic area cov­ered by IARU Region 3 there is a huge diver­si­ty of geog­ra­phy and demog­ra­phy.  The Asi­at­ic land mass pop­u­la­tion den­si­ties range from very high city den­si­ties to very low rur­al num­bers.  There are large extremes of cli­mate.  Many races and lan­guages are evi­dent.  Major coun­tries in terms of size, pop­u­la­tion and economies include Chi­na, India, Japan, Korea, Indone­sia, and the Philip­pines.  South-East Asia includes some very large island groups and pop­u­la­tions, down to small­er islands.

In the Pacif­ic area, the North and South Pacif­ic Oceans togeth­er are over twice the size of either the Indi­an or Atlantic Oceans.  The Pacif­ic cov­ers 32% of the world’s sur­face.  How­ev­er, less than 0.5% of the world’s pop­u­la­tion lives in Aus­trala­sia, with only a small frac­tion liv­ing in the Pacif­ic Islands.  The islands fall into three eth­nic groups: Microne­sia, Melane­sia and Poly­ne­sia.  Most are clus­tered in the North, West and South Pacif­ic.  There are not many islands in the East­ern Pacif­ic.  Dis­tances are huge and the com­mer­cial telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions and air­line ser­vices are often not well devel­oped.  Most of the large and more devel­oped coun­tries are around the rim of the Pacif­ic – New Zealand, Aus­tralia, Japan, Chi­na, Rus­sia, the West coasts of Cana­da and the USA.  Cen­tral and South Amer­i­can coun­tries also bor­der the Pacif­ic; but have few near­by island neigh­bours.  They do not have good trans­port links to their west and are not well placed to help development.

In Europe, Africa, the Amer­i­c­as and the Mid­dle East a sim­i­lar wide range of diver­si­ty exists.

Infrastructure Limitations

There are many lim­i­ta­tions on the sup­port­ing infra­struc­ture need­ed that enables a tech­ni­cal activ­i­ty like ama­teur radio to grow.  AC mains elec­tric pow­er is gen­er­al­ly essen­tial.  In a devel­op­ing econ­o­my this can be unre­li­able, not con­tin­u­ous, poor­ly reg­u­lat­ed and expen­sive – and may not be avail­able at all.  The need for a source of pow­er is sec­ond only to the need for radio equip­ment.  Solar or wind pow­er is more com­plex and expen­sive, but may be more prac­ti­cal in some locations.

A harsh cli­mate, while live­able for human sur­vival, is often hard on equip­ment, anten­nas, books and acces­sories.  Most inhab­it­ed areas on sea coasts have salt laden winds, high rain­fall and high humid­i­ty.  Dust and coral sand cause dam­age and inter­mit­tent faults.  At the extreme in some Pacif­ic Islands the cli­mate is gen­er­al­ly so warm that the hous­es do not have any walls and rely on sea breezes for nat­ur­al cool­ing.  This accel­er­ates cor­ro­sion and pro­vides no phys­i­cal secu­ri­ty.  Many oth­er phys­i­cal con­straints lim­it the devel­op­ment of ama­teur radio.

Funding

The lack of funds is also a lim­it­ing fac­tor.  Mon­ey is need­ed to progress pro­mo­tion and devel­op­ment pro­pos­als.  Inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions (the UN, ITU, World Bank, large spon­sors), and region­al sources (the Asian Devel­op­ment Bank, APT, gov­ern­ments) are pos­si­ble sources of fund­ing.  How­ev­er, they are often focused on very large projects, espe­cial­ly mul­ti-coun­try or region­al ones.  More real­is­ti­cal­ly, nation­al and local funds plus local com­mer­cial spon­sor­ships may need to be pur­sued.  IARU Region 3 can pro­vide some mod­est funding.

How­ev­er, if well researched and pre­sent­ed pro­pos­als are devel­oped, their mer­it will often attract fund­ing assis­tance.  Col­lect­ing mon­ey for non-spe­cif­ic or gen­er­al projects is usu­al­ly not productive.

If funds are sent direct­ly to the soci­ety of coun­try being assist­ed, it is essen­tial to iden­ti­fy and appoint a respon­si­ble local per­son to admin­is­ter the mon­ey or aid.  That per­son needs to be the nom­i­nat­ed point of con­tact.  If sig­nif­i­cant sums are involved an audit process should be established.

Equipment

Some pre­vi­ous efforts have ini­tial­ly focused on try­ing to obtain or devel­op suit­able HF band trans­ceivers.  How­ev­er, it is prob­a­ble that a sim­pler entry point is to use VHF and UHF equip­ment.  Low pow­er hand held trans­ceivers and DC pow­ered mobile/desk radios are now read­i­ly avail­able and costs have reduced.  They can be used for local com­mu­ni­ca­tions on repeaters and on sim­plex chan­nels.  A local “com­mu­ni­ty” of radio ama­teurs can be built up quick­ly, sup­port­ing and help­ing each oth­er.  Com­mu­ni­ty ser­vice and emer­gency com­mu­ni­ca­tions aims can be met.

The ide­al equip­ment spec­i­fi­ca­tion for an entry lev­el HF trans­ceiv­er has been the sub­ject of dis­cus­sion for a long time.  Some lim­its have to be set.  If it is too “basic” with inad­e­quate per­for­mance, many oper­a­tors (even new ones) will not want it.  Very com­plex trans­ceivers are hard for new oper­a­tors to under­stand, and expensive.

The essen­tial needs are in sum­ma­ry that equip­ment has to be – easy to oper­ate, reli­able, capa­ble of SSB and CW oper­a­tion; have mod­er­ate RF pow­er out­put (25 – 100 watts), mod­er­ate pow­er con­sump­tion and rea­son­able cost.  Ide­al­ly the trans­ceiv­er should be rugged and “trop­i­calised”; but this is expen­sive.  Some of the needs con­tra­dict one anoth­er.  Cost is a major fac­tor.  This can only be dri­ven down by mass pro­duc­tion (with quan­ti­ties in the thou­sands).  These fac­tors point to the equip­ment being based on an exist­ing mod­el or design.  Region­al or glob­al man­u­fac­ture is like­ly.  In all cas­es the dis­play sys­tem, oper­at­ing sys­tem and hand­books and man­u­als etc. need to be avail­able in Eng­lish to allow wide­spread deploy­ment and sales.

The use of low pow­er (QRP) is gen­er­al­ly not con­sid­ered to be prac­ti­cal for begin­ner oper­a­tors, remote from pop­u­la­tion cen­tres and help.  Kit sets are often also not suit­able, easy to get, or to con­struct suc­cess­ful­ly.  Frus­tra­tion from fail­ure to make con­tacts or get equip­ment oper­at­ing can kill enthu­si­asm quickly.

In a devel­op­ing coun­try there are often few spare parts or com­po­nents, test instru­ments or tech­ni­cal peo­ple avail­able to help when prob­lems arise.  There is also lit­tle used or sur­plus equip­ment for sale.  New equip­ment is expen­sive and it can be hard to get per­mis­sion to import it.  Oth­er items such as acces­sories, books and mag­a­zines can be dif­fi­cult to get.

Antennas

Suit­able anten­nas can also be a chal­lenge.  How­ev­er, solu­tions are poten­tial­ly eas­i­er to find.  Sim­plic­i­ty is impor­tant.  Sim­ple dipoles (or mul­ti-band or trap dipoles) can be made with coax­i­al cable or window/ladder line feed­ers.  Com­plete units can also be pur­chased.  Rugged design and qual­i­ty com­po­nents, with atten­tion to water proof­ing and cor­ro­sion resis­tance, are the keys for long life.  These are not impos­si­ble goals.  For a start up ama­teur sta­tion exten­sive use of alu­mini­um tub­ing, all band or high gain anten­nas and elab­o­rate sup­port struc­tures and tow­ers are not essential.

Print This Page Updated on January 29, 2020

Materials on this website may be subject to copyright.